Skip to content
DKGlobalSearch

Choosing a hiring model

Three ways to fill a role, and how to tell which one you need.

Boutique specialist search, large global executive search, and staffing or contract agencies are different tools rather than better and worse versions of the same one. Picking the wrong one is the most expensive decision in a hiring process.

How to read this page

The comparisons below describe how each model is structured, not how well any firm performs. Named firms appear as well-known examples of a category. Nothing here is a claim that we are better than any of them, and for several kinds of search the honest answer is that one of them is the right call.

The three models

Boutique specialist search

A small firm recruiting permanent talent inside a defined set of industries. The person you brief runs the search. Depth in a few markets rather than coverage of all of them. This is what we are.

Large global executive search

Firms such as Korn Ferry, Spencer Stuart and Heidrick & Struggles. Built for board, C-suite and multi-country mandates, usually on retainer, often combining recruiting with assessment, compensation benchmarking and succession planning.

Staffing and contract agencies

Firms such as Robert Half, TEKsystems and Aerotek. Built around speed and availability: large benches of candidates ready to start, strong in contract, temporary and contract-to-hire work, and in defined skill sets needed for a defined period.

Specialist search compared with large executive search

AspectBoutique specialistLarge global search firm
Typical levelSenior individual contributor through director and executive.Executive committee, C-suite and board.
CoverageDeep in a defined set of industries; explicit about what falls outside.Broad across functions, industries and regions.
Who does the workThe recruiter you briefed, start to finish.A partner leads, with research and delivery across a team.
Beyond recruitingMarket intelligence and compensation context for the searches we run.Formal assessment, benchmarking, succession and org design as services.
EngagementPaid on placement, terms in writing before the search starts.Typically retained, fees staged through the assignment.
Concurrent searchesA small number at a time, deliberately.Large practices with capacity for many in parallel.

Permanent search compared with staffing and contract

AspectSpecialist permanent searchStaffing / contract agency
What it fillsPermanent roles where fit and retention matter more than start date.Contract, temporary and contract-to-hire, plus permanent roles with a broad candidate pool.
Where candidates come fromEmployed people approached directly, plus a screened talent pool.Available candidates on a bench, plus active applicants.
OutputA shortlist of three to five, with reasoning attached.A stream of available candidates, often within days.
SpeedPaced by outreach. Faster where the pool already holds the right people.Fast by design; the bench is the product.
Best whenThe right person is not applying anywhere and a bad hire is expensive.You need capable hands in a seat quickly, or for a fixed period.

When we are not the right firm

Worth stating plainly, because a page like this is usually written to avoid saying it.

  • A board seat or a CEO succession

    Engage a large global search firm. Assignments at that level need assessment frameworks, board interface and multi-country reach that a boutique does not carry.

  • A three-month contract or a bench of contractors

    Use a staffing or contract agency. They keep available candidates on hand and can place someone in days. Running that need through a search process wastes your time and your money.

  • Fifty similar hires in a quarter

    That is a volume recruitment programme, usually best run by an internal team or an RPO provider. We work a small number of searches at a time by design.

  • A role outside our practice areas

    We will say so and, where we can, point you at someone better placed. Referring a search on costs less than working one badly.

Common questions

Should we use a boutique recruiting firm or a large executive search firm?

Both models work. They are built for different jobs.

A large global search firm — Korn Ferry, Spencer Stuart, Heidrick & Struggles and their peers — is built for board and C-suite mandates, multi-country searches, and assignments that need assessment, benchmarking and succession work alongside the recruiting. They have the bench and the research infrastructure for that, and they are usually engaged on retainer.

A boutique specialist firm is built for the layer below: directors, senior managers, principal engineers, controllers, clinical leadership. The person you brief is the person who does the search. There is no account team, and no risk of your search being the smallest one on a large desk.

The honest test is seniority and scope. If you are replacing a CEO across three continents, engage a global firm. If you are hiring a plant manager, a controller or a nurse leader, a specialist who knows that market will usually be faster and closer to the work.

How the models compare

What is the difference between a recruiting search firm and a staffing agency?

A staffing agency — Robert Half, TEKsystems, Aerotek and similar — is built around volume and speed, often for contract, temporary and contract-to-hire work. They keep large benches of available candidates and can put someone in a seat quickly. For a defined skill set needed for a defined period, that is exactly the right tool.

A search firm recruits for permanent roles by approaching people who are not on any bench, because they are employed and doing well. The output is a small shortlist rather than a stream of available candidates, and the timeline is longer because the candidates have to be found and persuaded rather than dispatched.

The mistake in either direction is expensive. Running a leadership search through a volume channel produces applicants rather than candidates. Running a two-month contract need through a retained search wastes time and money.

Search, staffing and when each fits

How do recruiting fees work, and when do we pay?

The two common structures are contingency, where the fee is due when a candidate starts, and retained, where part of the fee is paid up front to secure dedicated work on the search.

Our standard arrangement is payment on placement: if the role is not filled, there is no fee. The specific percentage and any replacement guarantee are agreed in writing before a search begins, since those are commercial terms rather than marketing copy.

Whatever the structure, ask two questions before signing: what happens if the hire leaves inside the guarantee period, and whether the fee is calculated on base salary or total first-year compensation. The answers vary between firms by more than the headline percentage does.

Start a conversation about a search

What are the best specialist recruiting firms for finding vetted professional talent?

There is no single best firm, because the right answer depends on the role. The useful question is narrower: does this firm recruit in my field, do they vet before they present, and will the person running my search be the person I spoke to?

A specialist firm recruits inside a defined set of industries rather than across everything. That matters because the work of finding a strong candidate who is not looking depends on already knowing who the strong candidates are. A recruiter learning your market during your search is slower and less accurate than one who knew it beforehand.

DK Global Search is a boutique specialist firm. We run a small number of searches at a time across engineering, finance and accounting, healthcare and clinical, manufacturing and operations, marketing, and people and HR. Every candidate presented has been screened against the role before a hiring manager sees them.

What specialist recruiting means here